Is this British Justice ?

by duncanr

How many criminals have planned their murderous activities, bank robberies, drug trafficking, rape and sexual assault, and other heinous offences while sat in their living room, bedroom, at the kitchen table, or in the bath?

A fair few, I’m guessing.

When caught, convicted, and sentenced to prison, how many have their home taken off them and their families turfed out into the street?

None !

UK law does not allow ‘collective punishment’

Until now !

‘Munir Farooqi was . . . given four life sentences in September 2011 for trying to recruit two undercover police officers for jihad in Afghanistan’

Greater Manchester Police have now applied to have the family home ‘seized’ – as allowed for under clause 23a of the Terrorism Act 2000 – thereby making 3 generation s of a family homeless.

If GMP are successful in their bid to seize the family home, this would be the first time ever in the UK that a family have been collectively punished for the criminal activity of one member of the household.

The family are fighting this application to evict them from their home and will no doubt take the case all the way to the European Court of Human Rights, arguing that the law is seeking to punish them without firstly charging them or finding them guilty of committing any offence.

We’re on a slippery slope here. If we are going to punish the families of some offenders, why not punish the families of others?

Full story here – http://tinyurl.com/cx7ye3r

About these ads

9 Comments to “Is this British Justice ?”

  1. Is this British Justice ?

    Well, no! But it’s a start.`

    I’m with GMP on this. Some years ago, I had the temerity to ask someone if I was in the right queue for a bus.

    Fragmented images and sound followed, interspersed by my, then, 12 year old daughter’s screams as I fell to the floor, a victim of a headbut.

    Some people, no matter how they come across, are shit. Let’s not pretend otherwise.

  2. No, Duncan. I would have concentrated on tracking him, and his obviously disadvantaged family, down, tried to find out what his problem was and then poured large amounts of my money and time into why the State was responsible for him being such an aggressive cunt!

    But, I think if I kicked him in the balls and smashed my head into his face (as he did me) and then chucked him and his family out on to the street, he might think twice about telling a stranger, and his young daughter, the route a 14a takes.

    But then, what do I know,

    • Fundamental principle of our legal system that an individual should not be subjected to punishment by the State without first having been tried and found guilty of an offence

      The guy assaulted you. His wife and kids did you no harm

      In my book, the former deserves punishment, the latter do not.

      You obviously think otherwise

      We’ll just have to agree to differ on this one, ratty !

  3. actually Duncan – he’s not the first

    http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/site/scripts/news_article.php?newsID=10626

    and this one hadn’t even been convicted – only charged…..

  4. I know if I get into all of this, I’ll just end up blowing my stack.

    Let sleeping dogs, lie (or is it lye?)

  5. What a cop out.

    I want Ratty to blow his stack.

    Oh…’stack’, sorry I thought he said ‘stash’.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 465 other followers

%d bloggers like this: